#questions

Anybody else got thoughts on this?

Dear Github, Here''s your list of things we need in this, the year of 2026, with the dawn of LLMs now past us and the full bore weight of the Gen AI spectre forced on us. Please fix: 1. Issues need to be about 100x faster to create, manage, log, read, and respond to in a more intuitive way. Intuitive for both us, the engineers working them and responsible for them, but also the Gen AI LLMs we bring the focus to work those issues. 2. Uptime. Nuff' said. 3. The threads of communication are at best confusing, often times trail off into the weeds, and are overall difficult to follow when AI or individuals are trying to communicate through or over a topic. This needs a full UX rework desperately. 4. We need deviation and alternate methods of getting code into trunk that doesn't always dictate a PR needs to be involved. Git is fast, but the process that is involved around it has become cumbersome from many perspectives. Thanks Dearest Github!

When multiple agents on a machine are running, do you use worktrees (like this https://compositecode.blog/2026/08/19/worktrees/) or do you use another method to split out your work? I've been pondering some new ideas, but wanted to ask the general community how you all are getting greater work separation to ensure reduced conflicts. So what ya got? Anybody? Anything?

It seems like there are a billion different folks babbling on in polished and fancy YouTube videos these days about how LLMs are doing work for em'. Some those are great videos with good information. A lot of other ones are just the same ole' same ole' repeat of many of the others. It's hard to truly make a good run of solid, reliable, and trustworthy content. It's also extremely difficult to watch videos and retain a lot of useful and significant information. MOST videos would be fine as a blog or email at a mere 3-4 paragraphs. Do you have any suggestions for GOOD video content that you find useful to watch? Even as background rambling? I'm in the process of collecting, and will be sharing my results in the near future! I'd however LOVE your help in putting together a more solid list beyond just what I myself have found. 🚀

Legit question here. There are studies and reports that have a vast number of people coming out of the education system with low reading and comprehension abilities. It was already a pretty significant problem in previous years, but now it is reportedly worse. If Gen AI/LLMs are basically just pushing us and leading many of us, much of what we do is read, respond, and then trust and verify what the LLMs are creating for us. How on Earth with this cratering comprehension among most people are we - as a society - supposed to maintain any reasonable and capable verification of the results LLMs provide us? The simple answer is we won't and can't expect that. It seems that might be the case. What is the resolution here? Emphasis on resolution vs. solution, because it's going to unfold however it does, it's clearly not in the wheelhouse of humanity to proactively do something about this now. What are your thoughts?